Commentary  |
Pharma Data

Synthetic Data: Democratising Data Access to Improve Patient Outcomes

30 June 2022
In this Commentary article, we explore some of the applications of synthetic data generation in the context of healthcare and treatment. Synthetic data can overcome problems surrounding privacy and enable the sharing of important medical information without compromising the privacy of patients.

Presented by: Khaled El Emam, University of Ottawa and Replica Analytics

Edited by: Ben Norris

Synthetic data generation is the process of creating realistic datasets that are not directly associated with real people – the data is based on, and statistically mimics, real datasets. As outlined by Khaled El Emam, from the University of Ottawa and Replica Analytics, machine learning models retain the patterns and statistical properties of real datasets. The anonymity afforded by synthetic data means it can be distributed and used for further analysis with minimal constraint, avoiding complications associated with FAIR data use that can hinder the sharing of data for medical purposes.

Synthetic Data: Medical Deepfakes for Healthcare Advancement

“The basis of synthetic data,” began Khaled El Emam at Oxford Global’s September 2021 Pharma Data and Smartlabs, “is that you start off with a real dataset.” The size of this source dataset can be anything from 50-100 patients to a population in the hundreds of thousands or millions of lives. Generative models capture many of the patterns in the source data, which are subsequently transformed through computer algorithms. “You’ve seen synthetic data before,” said El Emam, likening the technology to the techniques used to create deepfakes – digital likenesses of faces generated from data archives of real people. “The concept of a synthetic dataset works in a similar way, with the difference being that the subject is structured data rather than images.”

“You’ve seen synthetic data before. The concept of structured data works in a similar way to deepfakes.”

One of the benefits of a synthetic dataset is that the purpose of the synthetic data does not need to be known in advance. “Because it’s not personal information, it’s deemed to be non-identifiable or anonymous, which means you can share it with fewer constraints,” continued El Emam. “If you share synthetic data or if you make it available to data consumers, then they’ll be able to perform their analysis and produce similar results with the same conclusions as if they had access to the real datasets.”

Another advantage is that the actual model used to generate synthetic data can be shared in addition to the data itself. “The idea of a simulator exchange is instead of sharing data, you share the models that generate the synthetic data,” El Emam said. “So, you share the generative models, and then you provide access to the data consumers.”

Applications of Synthetic Data and Commitments to Privacy

The operation of the generative models used to create synthetic data is logical, as El Emam elaborated. “We essentially have two components – typically a generator and a discriminator” (see Figure 1). The generator produces a synthetic dataset from a real dataset, which the discriminator subsequently analyses and attempts to discern the difference between real and synthetic data. It then produces an evaluation which is sent back to the generator to tune its parameters.

Figure 1. The learning process for synthetic data generation.

Having established the basic principles of synthetic data, El Emam moved on to discuss privacy. “When we talk about privacy of data, at least in this context, we are talking about identifiability.” He outlined a spectrum of identifiability moving from one to zero, and stressed that data should be as close to the non-identifiable side of the threshold as possible. The threshold number on the spectrum differentiates between personal and non-personal information. He added that “the whole idea of synthesis is that it takes the original data and moves it along the spectrum until it crosses that threshold. Any residual risk is managed through additional controls such as security controls, privacy controls, and contractual controls.”

Overcoming Issues Associated with Traditional Risk Management Approaches

The more traditional risk management model that worked quite well in the past has been facing certain headwinds which has accelerated the adoption of synthetic data generation. “The value of the data diminishes as you apply transformations to it,” explained El Emam. “So what started to happen is organisations applied fewer transformations. And because they only applied a few transformations to preserve the utility of the data, the residual risk was very large, so they ended up having to implement more of these controls.” A negative narrative around traditional de-identification techniques also started to grow around the threat of re-identification attacks by certain bad actors, exposing the identities of patients whose data was supposedly anonymised.

El Emam continued that “synthetic data generation attempts to solve that problem.” He explained that the focus shifts to modifying the data to safely parameterise it within an acceptable level of risk. To achieve this, when properly transformed, data identifiability is well below the commonly-used risk threshold of 0.09. This is used by the European Medicines Agency and Health Canada, among others, for creating non-identifiable clinical trial datasets for public release.

“The probability of reunification of synthetic data with the patients it is derived from is quite low,” continued El Emam, “well below the 0.9 threshold.” Protecting the data in this way ensures that privacy can be maintained without compromising data utility. “The risks are significantly below the threshold even without any additional controls,” he added. “If you add controls then the risk will decrease further.”

Further Applications of Synthetic Data

Further to the benefits outlined above, real-world data diversity can be increased by augmenting datasets with virtual models (see Figure 2). “You use patients that have been recruited after a certain point in the trial, build the generative model from these patients and simulate the remaining patients,” continued El Emam. “We’re finding that by using generative models, we are able to draw the same conclusions from these hybrid controls compared to the real patient controls.” This can be helpful for assisting patients with rare diseases, as datasets for these are typically small.

Alignments between real and synthetic datasets for an oncology clinical trial.
Figure 2. Alignments between real and synthetic datasets for an oncology clinical trial. See Can synthetic data be a proxy for real clinical trial data? A validation study, published by BMJ Open.

Finally, synthetic patients can be used in prognostic or generative models to accurately simulate outcomes. “Because synthetic data generation models are essentially simulators, they can play the role of quite sophisticated prognostic models,” El Emam added. These models can be powerful tools, and can be used to run personalised simulations for individual patients based on their initial values.

Overcoming problems surrounding privacy and having the ability to share data with minimal constraints is one of the more powerful applications of synthetic data generation. El Emam concluded that there is plenty to keenly anticipate in the field of synthetic data. “As of today, the ability to share data with minimal constraints and meet all of the privacy obligations is one of the more powerful applications of synthetic data generation.”

Visit our PharmaTec portal to read more articles about the latest advances in Digital Medicine, including new discussions around data flow and regulatory approval. If you’d like to register your interest in our Pharma Data UK: In-Person event in London on 08 – 09 September, click here.

Speaker Biographies

Dr. Khaled El Emam is the Canada Research Chair (Tier 1) in Medical AI at the University of Ottawa, where he is a Professor in the School of Epidemiology and Public Health. He is also a Senior Scientist at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute and Director of the multi-disciplinary Electronic Health Information Laboratory, conducting research on privacy enhancing technologies to enable the sharing of health data for secondary purposes, including synthetic data generation and de-identification methods.
Khaled is also co-founder and CEO of Replica Analytics, a company that develops synthetic data generation technology.

Share this article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Sign up for our monthly PharmaTec Newsletter

You may also be interested in...

Insight Article
Metadata is a crucial aspect of implementing FAIR data principles and practices. Without metadata, you have no view of what is going on with your unstructured data, context as to what the data is or what it is for.
20 July 2022
Digitalisation is the reality for each of us in our private life. In laboratories, it’s still a dream. But why are we dreaming of digitalisation and of connectivity between your instruments and your leading systems when these things are actually at our fingertips? The reason might be obvious: when the right tools to connect all software silos are missing, we can’t be digitalised in reality.
05 July 2022

Continue browsing

Share this article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Join our PharmaTec mailing list

We produce cutting edge congresses and summits for the Life Sciences Industry, bringing together industry leaders and solution providers at a senior level, creating the opportunity to partner, network and knowledge share.

Contact Us:

Copyright Oxford Global Marketing Limited. All rights reserved.

Member Community Login

Stay up to date

Sign up for our monthly Editorial Newsletter to keep up with all things PharmaTec